FRESHERSHOME![]() |
This is a discussion on Numerical Analysis proof? within the Numerical Ability forums, part of the Freshers Zone category; If this question is not posed correctly, please let me know and I will add more detail... Prove that if ...
| |||||||
| Notices |
| Numerical Ability All Numerical Ability Related information and Q&A |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| If this question is not posed correctly, please let me know and I will add more detail... Prove that if f in C^2 is increasing, concaved up, and has a zero, then Newton's method will converge to it from ANY starting point. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Newton's method is iteratively defined: x_{i+1} = x_i - f(x_i)/f'(x_i) The first thing to notice is that because f is increasing, f'(x) is never zero, so no matter what point you start at you at least can always iterate. Next, let's suppose y is the zero (f(y) = 0). Then the idea is to prove that |x_{i+1} - y| < e*|x_i - y| for some 0<e<1 and any x_i>y (where x_{i+1} is defined from Newton's method). From this it's pretty easy to see that you have convergence starting from any x_0>y. Also it's not too hard to see that if x_0 < y then x_1 >y because of the concavity and the fact f is increasing. Thus if you prove the above inequality, then you're done. So, how to prove this inequality? Well, one way is to use Taylor's Theorem. One version of this states: f(x) = f(y) + f'(y)*(x-y) - int_x^y f''(t)*(y-t) dt = f'(y)*(x-y) - int_x^y f''(t)*(y-t) dt and f'(x) = f'(y) - int_x^y f'(t) dt. So, plugging this into Newton's method: x_{i+1} = x_i - (f'(y)*(x_i-y) - int_{x_i}^y f''(t)*(y-t) dt)/(f'(y) - int_{x_i}^y f'(t) dt). Subtract y from both sides and use the fact f''(t)*(t-y)>0 for t>y (I'm assuming x_i>y) to get to: x_{i+1} - y < (x_i - y)*(1 - f'(y)/(f'(y) - int_{x_i}^y f'(t) dt)) Finally, int_{x_i}^y f'(t) dt <0 since f'(t) >0, and so 0< 1 - f'(y)/(f'(y) - int_{x_i}^y f'(t) dt) < 1. This almost proves the result, there is one small detail left. If you take e = 1 - f'(y)/(f'(y) - int_{x_i}^y f'(t) dt then e depends on x_i, but you can get around that. All you have to show is that for a given starting x_0 > y, this quantity is bounded away from 1. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Wait up you caught me off guard, I have to look up newton's method!!., and you may be right!. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| numerical, analysis, proof |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Sitemap
Jobs by Location: Advertising and Marketing Jobs - IT Software Jobs - Walk-in Jobs - BPO Jobs - Government Jobs - Sales / BD Jobs - Tele Communication Jobs App Programming - Network Admin
Jobs By Location: Jobs in Bangalore - Jobs In India - Jobs in Delhi - Jobs in Hyderabad - Jobs in Kochi - Jobs in Mumbai - Jobs in Trivandrum - Jobs in pune - Jobs in Jonida - Jobs in Chennai - Jobs in Coimbator
Jobs Type: Full Time Jobs - Part Time Jobs
Latest Jobs - Accounting Jobs - Engineering Jobs - IT Jobs - Walkins - How to Face Interview - HR Round Tips - Career Info - Guide For Freshers - Apply for Jobs - Future Studies - Jobs Forums - Freshers IT Software Salary Details